banner image

When it comes to daylight design, sky really is the limit!

Competition Open: August 15, 2022 | Competition Closes: October 11, 2022

Register Intent to Enter Competition

 

Background

Daylighting is the deliberate and controlled use of natural light in buildings to allow for suitable amount of light to infiltrate through various building openings, including windows and skylights.  There are many benefits for including daylighting into our buildings.  Numerous studies have shown that that the health and productivity of people can increase with the quality of lighting in our buildings.  There are also obvious energy saving benefits that come from reduced need to artificial electric lighting.

All of this makes for a compelling case to maximize daylighting strategies in schools where students and staff can benefit from reduced absenteeism, improved mood and productivity.  This student competition is a case study of a school that recently underwent roof and skylight replacement.  The client (school board) wanted to improve the thermal performance of the building without compromising the daylighting features of the building.

Competition Tasks

Your task will be to analyze a roof and skylight retrofit proposal for an existing school building, focusing on daylighting and energy efficiency, from the perspective of young Building Science Consultants.  In groups of up to five (5), start by creating a name for your consulting company and assign team roles (i.e. project manager, cost manager, energy evaluator, daylight consultant, etc.).

The drawings of the existing school building that is undergoing a skylight and roof retrofit are available here.

The building is mass masonry construction, consisting of 4” block wall with 4” exterior brick, with gypsum board interior finishes and no insulation.  The existing roof deck is made out of wood.  Existing windows are aluminum framed, double glazed, air filled, no coating.  The building also has existing single glazed domed skylights.  Assume that the building has no cooling and no ventilation system, and the heating is provided by a boiler powered by natural gas.   Assume that the same boiler system provides domestic hot water.

If you need to make any further assumptions about the construction of the building, please state them in your submission.

Your tasks include the following:
  1. Review and analyze the attached drawings.  Describe scope of renovation work based on the provided information.
  2. Based on the available information, identify all key components of the building envelope prior to the renovation (including exterior walls, windows, and roof).
  3. Describe two proposed roof assemblies and their pros and cons in terms of assembly, cost and durability.  Comment on how the proposed assemblies compare to existing, in terms of durability, water/air/vapour management capabilities and thermal performance.
  4. Browse Artistic Skylight catalogue online at https://artisticskylight.com/ and select two (2) options that would be appropriate for the renovation.  Compare and contrast the two proposed skylights based on thermal performance, cost and ease of installation.
  5. Complete basic heat flow analysis of the existing and the proposed building enclosure assemblies including R value hand-calculations for exterior walls and the roof assemblies.  Include assumptions and/or calculations for R values for existing and proposed skylights based on a literature review and/or the manufacturer’s data (please provide APA style references for all referenced material).
  6. Include section sketches of the proposed roof assembly at:
    1. Skylight,
    2. Parapet, and
    3. Option of:
      1. Eavestrough
      2. Upturn wall flashing
      3. Roof Drain   
  7. Please include one of the following;

    Option A
    Include basic daylighting analysis using hand calculations/sketches or a software such as LITESTAR 4D Litecalc. Hand calculations should include calculations of sun angles at solar noon in January and July through skylights and windows.  Compare daylighting levels with and without skylights, using hand or computer-generated sketches. 

    Option B
    Include basic analysis of the overall annual heating cost of the entire building after the retrofit either using hand calculations or a software such as HOT2000.  Assume that mechanical and electrical system upgrades are not part of the retrofit of the building.  Provide comparison of annual heating costs before and after the retrofit, ideally shown in graph format.  Alternatively, you can provide a basic analysis of hygrothermal performance of the existing and the proposed roof assembly based on the location of the dew point temperature (in January) or you can use a software such as WUFI. 

  8. Present your findings and analysis in a professional video presentation to a client outlining the proposed retrofit strategy and energy savings.  Include all your detailed assumptions, calculations, and literature review in the appendix.

References

Please list all references in APA format and included them in the appendix and/or the presentation slides, as required. FAILURE TO PROVIDE PROPER REFERENCES MAY BE CONSTRUED AS PLAGARISM AND MAY GET YOU DISQUALIFIED.

Submission Format and Timelines

  1. September 30, 2022: Register your “Intent to Submit” here 
    <ccbst2022.obec.on.ca/e-registration/7/ccbst-student>
  2. October 11, 2022: Video presentation and appendices due.
    1. Video to be a maximum of 10 minutes.
    2. Videos can be sent via the student’s choice of a file transfer system to ccbst@obec.on.ca by 5:00 PM EST October 11. Please also send an email to ccbst@obec.on.ca advising the file was sent.
    3. Maximum 12 slides to be covered in the presentation.
    4. Appendices (submitted in PDF format) to include, but not limited to, calculations, literature review, HOT2000 report printouts, bibliography, etc.
  3. October 11 – 17, 2022: Judging of submissions by the external panel of building science and educational experts.
  4. October 18: Winners notified.

Prizes

  • Winning team receives complimentary full registration for all teammates (max 5 students) to the CCBST Conference Oct 26 – 28 at the Paramount Event Centre  (excludes CCCBST Dinner)
  • TV monitor in conference foyer displaying the initial submission (yes, your submission could be viewed by hundreds of industry peers, not just the judging panel!)
  • Up to two (2) rooms hotel accommodation provided for one night, October 27, 2022*
  • Table in foyer for team to display other items on the project or about the winning team
  • Complimentary OBEC Student Membership for each team member valid until June 30, 2023
  • Complimentary Student access to OBEC webinars until June 30, 2023
  • Opportunity to write re-cap story of competition experience/conference (Team showcase) for the OBEC Magazine - Pushing the Envelope Canada – Winter 2023 edition

*Applicants are responsible for any travel expenses.

Judging Criteria

Criteria for Assessment

Marks

Task 1

Review and Analysis of Tender Drawings. The review should include identification and description of all key components of the building envelope and their performances (pros and cons) prior to the renovation (including exterior walls, windows, and roof). 

/ 10 marks

Task 2

Description of scope of renovation work based on the provided information and analysis included in Task 1. 

/ 10 marks

Task 3

Description of main two roof assemblies, their pros and cons in terms of assembly, cost and durability. 

/ 10 marks

Task 4

Provide description of the advantages/considerations of skylight addition to the renovation scope.  Select two options from the Artistic Skylight catalogue that would be appropriate for the renovation.  Compare and contrast the two proposed skylights based on thermal performance, cost, installation methods, details and ease of installation with respect to the roof assembly.             

/ 15 marks

Task 5

Complete basic heat flow analysis of the existing and the proposed building enclosure assemblies (walls and the roof) based on the made assumptions. The analysis to include but not limited to R-values and possible thermal bridges. Students to include assumptions and/or calculations for R-values for existing and proposed skylights based on a literature review and/or the manufacturer’s data.    

/ 15 marks

Task 6

Include section sketches of the proposed roof assembly at:

a. Skylight
b. Parapet
c. Option of

i. Eavestrough
ii. Upturn wall flashing
iii. Roof Drain   

/ 10 marks

Task 7

Students to include one of the following;

Option A
Daylighting analysis. With or without skylight comparison. Comparison before and after. 

Hand or computer-generated sketches.

Option B
Include basic analysis of the overall annual heating cost of the entire building after the retrofit either using hand calculations or a software such as HOT2000.  Assume that mechanical and electrical system upgrades are not part of the retrofit of the building.  Alternatively, you can provide a basic analysis of hygrothermal performance of the roof assembly based on the location of the dew point temperature (in January) or you can use a software such as WUFI. Single glazed vs. double glazed, cost comparison. Ideally shown in graph format.

/ 15 marks

Task 8

Presentation  
Present your findings and analysis in a professional video presentation to a client outlining the proposed retrofit strategy and energy savings.  Include all your detailed assumptions, calculations and literature review in the Appendix.  Higher marks will be awarded to the Group 

Presentation which is complete, organized and flows well so that demonstrates the proposed retrofit strategy and energy savings.  Also, higher marks will be awarded when the Group uses an excellent selection of material for presentation which includes any assumption(s), calculations and literature review in the Appendix. Marks will be awarded to the Speakers who work together as a team, identifying team members roles, professionally present themselves; speak in a clear voice, and at a good pace.  In addition, they will use photographs, graphs, diagrams and sketches (where necessary); ensuring not too much text on a slide, uses a large legible font.  Lastly, the Group will be marked on their presentation to ensure it is well timed (not too long, not too short). 

/ 15 marks

Total
/100 marks

 


Thank You to Our Current Sponsors

  • Diamond Sponsor

    edge group
  • Emerald Sponsor

    artistic skylight domes
  • Emerald Sponsor

    owens corning
  • Emerald Sponsor

    pretium
  • Emerald Sponsor

    pretium
  • Emerald Sponsor

    soprema
  • Gold Sponsor

    exp
  • Associate Sponsor

    cufca
  • Silver Sponsor

    elastochem
  • Silver Sponsor

    elastochem
  • Silver Sponsor

    pcl construction
  • Silver Sponsor

    prodemnity
  • Bronze Sponsor

    Ellis Don
  • Bronze Sponsor

    Entuitive
  • Bronze Sponsor

    HRI
  • Bronze Sponsor

    HRI
  • Bronze Sponsor

    Leading Edge
  • Bronze Sponsor

    NaturaSeal
  • Bronze Sponsor

    NaturaSeal
  • Bronze Sponsor

    rdh
  • Bronze Sponsor

    State Window Corporation
  • Bronze Sponsor

    Synergy Partners
  • Bronze Sponsor

    tremco
  • Bronze Sponsor

    tritan
  • Bronze Sponsor

    Sealtight